August 23, 2014 Subject:
ID is not science
Here you hear that "Darwinian Evolution" is disputed or plain wrong. Intelligent Design is advocated by software ingeneers comparing the genetic code with intentionally placed information?
That is plain wrong; software ingeneers should stay with their field and go to have an influenza shot with a doctor and not from Bill Gates.
Evolution through the processes of random mutation and natural selection are fact beyond the slightest doubt.
Supposing a anything else like Divine Guidance is utter nonsense and religious crap.
How else could be explained that the vast majority of genetic mutations is not advantageous and the individuals, humans or whatever they are, do not survive or do not have enough offspring to proliferate their genes?
Giving such arguments a place in this site is just waste of time.